Karl Poling vs Connor Thomson Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 10 Nov at 06:53 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
K. Poling vs C. Thomson

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Poling 1 - 0 Thomson
They have played 2 sets in total, with Karl Poling winning 2 and Connor Thomson winning 0. The last match between Karl Poling and Connor Thomson was at the Drummondville Challenger, 10-11-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: I.hard, with Karl Poling getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Poling | 1 |
| Thomson | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) Drummondville Challenger(11-10-25)
K. Poling vs C. Thomson H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $2,255 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 52.50% (84-76) | Career Total W/L | 41.67% (15-21) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
K. Poling vs C. Thomson Match Preview:
- Second serve effectiveness shows minimal difference, with Connor Thomson achieving a slightly higher winning percentage at 45.11% compared to Karl Poling's 44.29%.
- In return games, Connor Thomson holds a narrow advantage, winning 45.55% of opponents' second serve points, while Karl Poling follows closely at 44.66%.
- Looking at first serve returns, Karl Poling has a slight edge, winning 27.60% versus Connor Thomson's 25.67%.
- When facing breakpoints, Connor Thomson outperforms Karl Poling, successfully saving 60.14% compared to Poling's 54.06%.
- Over the past year, Connor Thomson has a superior match win rate of 55.56% against Karl Poling's 48.53%.
- Career-best surface analysis reveals that Karl Poling excels on indoor hard courts with a 53% win rate, whereas Connor Thomson performs best on grass, matching that 53% win rate.
- In terms of player level, Connor Thomson has shown a higher win percentage in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments at 61.54%, compared to Karl Poling's 50.00%.
- Average opponent ranking faced by Connor Thomson is slightly higher, standing at 350.56, while Karl Poling's opponents average at 365.6.
- Both players have an equal deciding set win rate at 50% in the past year.
- Converting break points, Karl Poling leads with a 34.15% success rate, significantly higher than Connor Thomson's 26.03%.
Editorial Prediction (November 10, 2025, UTC):
As we analyze recent performances, Connor Thomson seems to hold a slight advantage in second serve points and return game stats, which nonetheless, are closely matched by Karl Poling.
Looking at breakpoint scenarios, Thomson's ability to save more of these crucial points could prove decisive. Yet, Poling's proficiency in converting breakpoint opportunities himself might balance this aspect.
Though both players perform well on different surfaces, Thomson's higher success in ITF-level tournaments signifies better form against similarly ranked opponents.
Overall, given the minor statistical edges and competitive form in certain key areas, Connor Thomson appears the more likely victor in the upcoming match. However, Poling's strengths should not be underestimated in high-pressure situations.
Karl Poling vs Connor Thomson Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
K. Poling vs C. Thomson H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:2:45 | Average Match Time | 1:2:45 |
| 63% (26/41) | 1st Serve % | 69% (37/54) |
| 73% (19/26) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (22/37) |
| 87% (13/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 29% (5/17) |
| 36% (4/11) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (27/54) | Return Points Win % | 22% (9/41) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
K. Poling Recent Matches Played
C. Thomson Recent Matches Played

K. Poling vs C. Thomson Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52.50% (84/76) | YTD Win/Loss | 41.67% (15/21) |
| 51.23% (188/179) | Sets Win/Loss | 43.90% (36/46) |
| 51.43% (1759/1661) | Games Win/Loss | 47.22% (373/417) |
| 52.70% (39/35) | Hard Win/Loss | 40.00% (6/9) |
| 53.06% (26/23) | Clay Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 54.29% (19/16) | Indoor Hard W/L | 40.00% (6/9) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 60.00% (3/2) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.37 |
| 249 | Aces Total | 145 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 341 | Total Double Faults | 80 |
| 1:19:41 | Average Match Time | 1:24:46 |
| 383.25 | Average Opponent Rank | 376.67 |
| 65% (5449/8338) | 1st Serve % | 62% (1282/2055) |
| 66% (3606/5449) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (874/1282) |
| 49% (1430/2889) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (361/773) |
| 43% (381/883) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 37% (62/167) |
| 40% (3413/8451) | Return Points Win % | 36% (721/1978) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 48.65% (18/19) | Challenger W/L | 22.22% (2/7) |
| 54.17% (65/55) | Futures W/L | 48.15% (13/14) |
| 52% (80/155) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 42% (15/36) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 34% (12/35) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (7/13) |
| 51% (25/49) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (4/10) |
| 88% (75/66) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (13/12) |
| 12% (75/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (13/1) |
| 19% (85/16) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (23/3) |